We thought it might be interesting to show a little comparison of throttle response between a conventional ignition/flywheel engine, and one with a very light rotational mass, Power Spark system. While we are VERY happy with the response of all our engines ( water and static ), I think the difference is quite apparent. These two engines are very similar in most ways. Apart from the J&G being a sleeved motor and down 3ccs; they both have 29mm. stroke, are ported almost identically, have the same compression ratio ( smaller chamber and displacement on the J&G ), timed within 5 degrees intake - rest of ports the same, both reciprocating assemblies are light ( the MK hybrid is slightly heavier, but has a heavier air cooled crank ), both identical carbs and intake, and the pipes are tuned to the same length, with the hybrid having a slightly larger diameter stinger to keep back pressure reasonable with the larger displacement. While the MK is running on our custom ign. map, at the RPM levels in the vids, the timing is very close. So power aside, the major difference to throttle response is the J&G has a roughly 290 gram flywheel/pulley, and the hybrid has a 67 gram flywheel/pulley. Add the magnetic drag of the three large magnets on the conventional flywheel to the mix. As well as having quick response for getting on load quickly, it's especially good to have a motor that shuts down so quickly when things go bad. The throttle inputs on both these motors was at the most, 1/4 blurps.
Anyway, this was fun to run a little fuel.
I think it's fixed. Thanks Pete!